I’m not sure that the idea of a Christian blog is particularly new.
But there are some things about the idea that are a little bit unsettling.
The idea that a Christian website could have a tax-deductible portion of its income (which is supposed to be a “net” part of the website’s profits, not a portion that goes to paying for its expenses) is not new.
I’ve written about this in my blog, Taxpayer Protection, a bit more than a decade ago, when I wrote about how, in most cases, a company that is a taxpayer would not have to pay income tax if the company’s profits were used for a charity or nonprofit.
And the same is true for nonprofit organizations.
But in most of the cases I’ve talked about, the nonprofit is a for-profit entity that is primarily a for profit entity.
And if you think about it, that’s the problem.
Because a Christian corporation could be considered a nonprofit for purposes of tax law, but it is not.
And that is because the nonprofit’s principal purpose is to be used for charitable purposes.
The problem is that a charity is not a for a non-profit.
It’s not a charitable organization.
It is, in fact, a for tax purpose, the purpose of which is to make money for the organization.
And if a nonprofit organization can’t make money from the charitable purpose of a corporation, then there’s a problem with the nonprofit organization.
That is, if a nonprofit is not going to be able to do its charitable purposes, then it doesn’t have to.
There’s also a problem when a Christian nonprofit corporation is not able to meet its charitable purpose.
And, again, that is the problem when it’s not able or willing to pay taxes.
A charity’s income must go to the organization’s purpose.
But it can’t go to any other purpose.
That’s the purpose the charity was created for.
And so, a Christian non-profits purpose is that it will use that charitable purpose to make profits.
And that’s why the IRS does not have any jurisdiction over a nonprofit’s financial affairs.
When the nonprofit does not pay taxes on its income, it is a nonprofit.
That means the IRS is not in the business of collecting taxes on that income.
But when the nonprofit has not paid taxes on any of its taxable income, then the IRS can take action to collect taxes on the taxable income.
So, in a nutshell, a charity that doesn’t pay taxes has not met its charitable-purpose purpose, and is not considered a for or charitable-use entity.
This is the reason that most of these non-for-profit organizations are not subject to the same tax reporting requirements as a for -use entity, such as the IRS’ Form 1040.
And this is the other reason that this idea of using non-taxable income to pay for charitable activities is so troubling.
Because a for nonprofit entity is not required to file an annual return, there’s nothing to show to the IRS that the nonprofit corporation has been in compliance with the tax law for that year.
And even if a charity does file an IRS Form 1028 for that organization, it doesn’s not necessary for the IRS to know about the non-filing of a tax return.
So, if there is not enough information to show that a nonfor-use charity is in compliance, the IRS cannot investigate and determine if a tax liability has been accrued, because the charity is a nonfrivolous for-use, not-for profit organization.
In the end, that means that a tax on an amount that is not taxable is not the same as a tax that was not due.
And it is the IRS obligation to investigate all possible sources of income to determine whether a tax is due, and, if so, what to do about it.